Recent Developments

An employee's off-duty conduct generally is not a basis for work-related punishment - at least in workplaces protected by "just cause" under a union contract. Public employees frequently face a greater likelihood that off-duty misconduct will be used to punish them, even with union protection. The Supreme Judicial Court, in two cases issued last week, limited the penalties suffered by public employees who committed reprehensible criminal acts while off-duty.

On Friday, August 15, 2012, the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court issued a unanimous decision affirming that SEIU, Local 509 has direct standing, on its own behalf, to challenge privatization decisions by state agencies when those agencies fail to follow the statutory pre-contracting requirements that give Unions representing state workers the opportunity to take steps to save their members’ jobs.

By a vote of 37-1, adjuncts who teach pre-college (or non-college) courses at Northeastern University voted to join 1,000 other adjuncts in the existing SEIU bargaining. Attorneys Patrick Bryant and David Rome represented SEIU and its Adjunct Action effort in this campaign.

It is illegal for employers to misclassify employees as "independent contractors," especially in an effort to avoid minimum wage and overtime obligations. Attorney Betsey Ehrenberg, a founding partner of the union/employee-side law firm Pyle Rome Ehrenberg, PC, successfully sued night club owner Kevin Moury for this type of misclassification. Instead of paying his workers a minimum wage (let alone a livable one), Moury forced employees to pay him to work. He also fined workers who failed to pay the mandatory shift fee.

The Vermont Labor Relations Board has dismissed a charge alleging that the Vermont State Employees Association committed an unfair labor practice by expelling from union office a member who was involved in a rival organizing campaign. In a case of first impression, the VLRB adopted the position held by the National Labor Relations Board that the Labor Board may not interfere in a union's internal affairs unless the union's actions "affect a member's employment status and relationship as an employee with his employer" or "impair any policy embedded in" State labor law.

The National Labor Relations Board has agreed that a group of cosmetics and fragrance employees at the Saugus location of iconic department store Macy's can elect to form a union. Attorney Warren Pyle successfully represented his longstanding client UFCW Local 1445 in this matter. Pyle persuaded the Board to rejected the employer's demands that all employees at the Saugus store must have a voice in whether to form a union.

Just because an employee has been disciplined in the past does not mean that an employer has the right to terminate him or her for a subsequent offense. Attorney Ian Russell persuaded an arbitrator that "just cause" language requires an employer to document performance issues and to notify an employee that termination will result from future misconduct. The arbitrator here reinstated the employee under a collective bargaining agreement negotiated by 1199SEIU United Health Care Workers East.

The Herald News spotlights efforts of Fall River Fire Fighters Local 1314 IAFF to oppose the recent layoff of 27 Fire Fighters. Attorney Leah Barrault was on hand to forcefully advocate for Local 1314 and its members.

A state administrative law judge determined that Medford Fire Chief Frank Giliberti engaged in textbook illegal retaliation by reprimanding the President of Medford Fire Fighters Association Local 1032, IAFF, and a grievant for pursuing settlement discussions with a mayor's representative. Attorney Jillian Ryan represented Local 1032 in this matter.

Today, the five conservatives of the U.S. Supreme Court ruled ruled, that state-paid homecare workers cannot be required to pay their fair share of the costs of union representation to the union elected by a majority to serve as their the exclusive bargaining representative. The Supreme Court’s decision from Harris v.